Shaoyun Liu vs Jimmy Yang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W L L
Form
L L L L L W L W L LH2H: Liu 1 - 0 Yang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Liu winning 2 and Yang winning 1. The last match between Liu and Yang was at the M25 Tianjin, 17-07-2024, First, Hard with Shaoyun Liu getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shaoyun Liu | 1 |
| Jimmy Yang | 0 |
M25 Tianjin(17-07-2024)
6
3
6
7
6
3
| Liu | Stats | Yang |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 849 |
| Highest Rank | 709 | |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 49% (33-34) | Career Total W/L | 45% (77-95) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Shaoyun Liu
Player
Jimmy Yang
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:38:0 | Average Match Time | 2:38:0 |
| 57% (46/80) | 1st Serve % | 54% (55/101) |
| 74% (34/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (35/55) |
| 47% (16/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (46/101) | Return Points Win % | 38% (30/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shaoyun Liu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Jimmy Yang
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Jimmy Yang
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Yanjie Zheng
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yong Joon Park
Player
Jimmy Yang
36%
(
34 of
95)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
6
Aces
13
12
Double Faults
9
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Minghui Zhang
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jimmy Yang
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
84%
(
41 of
49)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shaoyun Liu
Player
Jimmy Yang
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Jimmy Yang
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Barki
Player
Jimmy Yang
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (33/34) | Win/Loss | 45% (77/95) |
| 51% (75/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (179/209) |
| 51% (737/720) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1850/1957) |
| 49% (25/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (52/65) |
| 45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) |
| 60% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (14/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 91 | Aces Total | 615 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 93 | Total Double Faults | 504 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:11:11 |
| 45.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 291.3 |
| 58% (1321/2291) | 1st Serve % | 57% (4418/7741) |
| 65% (865/1321) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3092/4418) |
| 49% (479/970) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1503/3323) |
| 45% (98/218) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (287/667) |
| 40% (932/2323) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2966/7778) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 49% (33/34) | Futures W/L | 46% (76/90) |
| 48% (32/66) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (76/171) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (8/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (28/50) |
| 33% (5/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 86% (36/31) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (88/70) |
| 14% (36/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (88/18) |
| 6% (31/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (84/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
